General
Douglas et al. v. California
372 U.S. 961·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 15, 1963.
No. 34.
Douglas et al. v. California,
Burton Marks for petitioners on the motion. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Jack E. Ooertzen, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
ante, p. 353. The motion for allowance of attorney’s transportation expenses is denied.