General
POMATI v. UNITED STATES
245 F. 988·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
POMATI v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 22, 1917.)
No. 3060.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the Northern District of California.
John W. Preston, U. S. Atty., and Ed. P. Jared, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of counsel for the appellee, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered, appeal dismissed for noncompliance by the appellant with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court (150 Fed. xxix, 79 C. C. A. xxix).