Contracts · MBE-tested

PRICE et al. v. MOSS et al.

374 U.S. 103·Supreme Court of the United States·1963

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Goldberg concur in the result. · Mr. Justice Harlan would postpone consideration of the question of jurisdiction until after argument on the merits.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

PRICE et al. v. MOSS et al. No. 688. Decided June 10, 1963. Walt Allen, Jim A. Rinehart, Leon S. Hirsh and James C.Harkin for appellants in No. 688. Frank Carter for appellants in No. 689. Norman Reynolds, Jr. and Sid White for appellees. Together with No. 689, Oklahoma Farm Bureau et al. v. Moss et al., on appeal from the same Court. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed as the order of the District Court is not appeal-able under 28 U. S. C. § 1253. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Goldberg concur in the result. Mr. Justice Harlan would postpone consideration of the question of jurisdiction until after argument on the merits.