General

Jacob Corleis, Respondent, v. Benedict Fischer et al., Appellants

155 N.Y. 657·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Jacob Corleis, Respondent, v. Benedict Fischer et al., Appellants. Reported below, o App. Div. 622. (Argued February 28, 1898; decided March 8, 1898.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 25,1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made upon the ground that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided that there were facts tending to support the verdict, and that the exceptions present no question for review. Hotchkiss & Maddox for motion. Uriah W. Tompkins opposed. [MAJORITY] Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.