Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Francis W. TULLY, 1926 — 12 F.2d 624 · caselaw · US
IP
In the Matter of the Application of Francis W. TULLY
12 F.2d 624·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Francis W. TULLY.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted November 17, 1925.
Decided April 5, 1926.)
No. 1782.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and SMITH, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.
[MAJORITY — ROBB, Associate Justice.]
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office, rejecting claims 2 to 10, inclusive, 15 to 19, inclusive, and 22 to 25, inclusive.
Seven .claims were allowed appellant. The case is closely related to patent appeal No. 1781 (12 F.[2d] 624), just decided, and, for the reasons fully stated by the tribunals of the Patent Office, the decision is affirmed.
Affirmed.