Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Viking Theatre Corp. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. et al., 1963 — 375 U.S. 939 · caselaw · US
General
Viking Theatre Corp. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. et al.
375 U.S. 939·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 481.
Viking Theatre Corp. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. et al.
Edward Bennett Williams, Harold Ungar and Henry W. Sawyer III for petitioner. Louis Nizer, W. Bradley Ward, Louis J. Goffman, Morris Wolf, Frederick W. R. Pride, Arthur Littleton and Edwin P. Rome for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.