Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jewell et al. v. Docking, Governor of Kansas, et al., 1975 — 420 U.S. 957 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Jewell et al. v. Docking, Governor of Kansas, et al.
420 U.S. 957·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
March 3, 1975
No. 74-552.
Jewell et al. v. Docking, Governor of Kansas, et al.
MR. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of the following:
No. 74-552, Jewell et al. v. Docking et al., infra this page; No. 74-682, Crete Carrier Corp. v. United States et al., infra, p. 958; No. 74-5568, Garcia v. United States, infra, p. 960; No. 74-5599, Grace v. California, infra, p. 960; No. 74-5633, Iannarelli v. Morton, Secretary of the Interior, et al., infra, p. 960; No. 74-5634, Stone et al. v. United States, infra, p. 960; No. 74-5636, Patterson v. United States, infra, p. 961; No. 74-5646, Curry v. United States, infra, p. 961; No. 74-5651, Martinez v. United States, infra, p. 961; No. 74-5658, Marrocco v. United States, infra, p. 961; No. 74-5664, Hoog v. United States, infra, p. 961; No. 74-5665, Gaither v. United States, infra, p. 961; No. 74-5674, Villasencia-Garcia v. United States, infra, p. 961; No. 74-5680, Olmstead v. United States, infra, p. 961; No. 74-5681, Wright v. United States, infra, p. 961; No. 74-5686, Segura v. United States, infra, p. 961; No. 74-5691, Sloan v. United States, infra, p. 961; No. 74-5607, Crenshaw v. Wolff, Warden, infra, p. 966; No. 74-5629, Granillo v. United States, infra, p. 966; and No. 74-5648, Lyon v. United States, infra, p. 966.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. Kan.