General
Tureaud v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College et al.
346 U.S. 881·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Mr. Justice Reed dissents on the ground that the status of the applicant at the institution of the litigation should be preserved pending final judgment.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No.-.
Tureaud v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College et al.
Robert L. Carter for petitioner. Fred S. LeBlanc, Attorney General of Louisiana, W. C. Perrault, First Assistant Attorney General, J. Clyde Pearce, Assistant Attorney General, Fred A. Blanche, Sr., Arthur O’Quin, Leander H. Perez, C. V. Porter, Victor A. Sachse, Grove Stafford, Oliver Stockwell, Wood H. Thompson, John H. Tucker, Jr., W. Scott Wilkinson and Laurance W. Brooks for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
This is an application by the relator for a stay of the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit which is to be brought here for review in a petition for certiorari. The application is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is stayed until the final disposition here of the petition for certiorari to be filed.
Mr. Justice Reed dissents on the ground that the status of the applicant at the institution of the litigation should be preserved pending final judgment.