General
WATTS v. UNITED STATES
216 F. 991·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1914
Before PARDEE, Circuit Judge, and GRUBB and CAUL, District Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WATTS v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 29, 1914.)
No. 2709.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia ; William T. Newman, Judge.
Stiles Hopkins, of Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff in error. John W. Henley, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Atlanta, Ga., for the United States.
Before PARDEE, Circuit Judge, and GRUBB and CAUL, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
As no bill of exceptions was taken and allowed in the trial court, the only question on this writ of error is whether the count of the indictment under which the plaintiff in error was convicted is sufficient, and as to that we And that the objections urged by the demurrer were not well founded. Judgment affirmed.