Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BAKER et al., dba BAKER & FORD v. ALASKA, 1965 — 380 U.S. 260 · caselaw · US
General
BAKER et al., dba BAKER & FORD v. ALASKA
380 U.S. 260·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BAKER et al., dba BAKER & FORD v. ALASKA.
No. 849.
Decided March 15, 1965.
Bruce T. Binker, Charles S. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr., for appellants.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.