Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.; and Whiting Milk Co. v. Same, 1939 — 306 U.S. 627 · caselaw · US
General
H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.; and Whiting Milk Co. v. Same
306 U.S. 627·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 772.
No. 809.
H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.; and Whiting Milk Co. v. Same.
March 27, 1939.
Messrs. Charles B. Rugg, Warren F. Farr, 11. Brian Holland, Archibald Cox, and Edward F.'Merrill for petitioners in No. 772.
Mr. Lawrence C. Jones, Attorney General of Vermont, filed a memorandum, by leave of Court, in support of petitioners in No. 772.
Messrs. John M. Ray- mondr Lawrence Foster, and Augustin H. Parker, Jr. for petitioner in No. 809.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit granted.
Solicitor General Jackson for respondents.
Reported below: 97 F. 2d 677.