Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
National Lead Co. et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, 1956 — 351 U.S. 964 · caselaw · US
General
National Lead Co. et al. v. Federal Trade Commission
351 U.S. 964·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 877.
National Lead Co. et al. v. Federal Trade Commission.
John B. Henrich, Jr. for the National Lead Co., Robert A. Sturges for the Sherwin-Williams Co., Richard Serviss for the Eagle-Picher Co. et al., petitioners; and Thomas J. McDowell and Nathan S. Blumberg were also of counsel. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Charles H. Weston, Earl W. Kintner and Robert B. Dawkins for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.