Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
The National Bank of Commerce in New York, Respondent, v. The Whiteman Pulp and Paper Company et al., Respondents, et al., Appellants
138 N.Y. 636·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The National Bank of Commerce in New York, Respondent, v. The Whiteman Pulp and Paper Company et al., Respondents, et al., Appellants.
(Argued April 24, 1893;
decided May 5, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made February 6,1893, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by Webster B. Van Ruys, a lienor, to vacate an attachment.
Fred. W. Hoyes for appellants.
Frederie A. Wcurd for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.