Corporations
Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman et al.; and International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, CIO, v. Huffman et al.
344 U.S. 814·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 193.
No. 194.
Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman et al.; and International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, CIO, v. Huffman et al.
William T. Gossett, L. Homer Surbeck and Richard W. Hogue, Jr. for petitioner in No. 193.
Lowell Goerlich and Sol Goodman for petitioner in No. 194.
Samuel M. Rosenstein for respondents.
Briefs of amici curiae supporting the petition in No. 193 were filed by Nicholas Kelley, Francis S. Bensel and Hancock Griffin, Jr. for the Chrysler Corporation; and George Morris Fay for the Briggs Manufacturing Co. Louis S. Lebo filed a brief for the Electric Auto-Lite Co., as amicus curiae, supporting the petitions.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted. Motion for leave to file brief of Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, as amicus curiae, denied.
Reported below: 195 F. 2d 170.