Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Biggers v. Tennessee; Anderson v. Johnson, Warden; Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr et al., dba Farr, Whitlock & Co., et al.; Powell v. National Savings & Trust Co., 1968 — 390 U.S. 1037 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Biggers v. Tennessee; Anderson v. Johnson, Warden; Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr et al., dba Farr, Whitlock & Co., et al.; Powell v. National Savings & Trust Co.
390 U.S. 1037·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 237.
No. 700.
No. 968.
No. 1033.
Biggers v. Tennessee, Anderson v. Johnson, Warden, Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr et al., dba Farr, Whitlock & Co., et al., Powell v. National Savings & Trust Co.,
[MAJORITY]
ante, p. 404;
ante, p. 456;
ante, p. 956; and
ante, p. 957. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.