Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bobby CHEN, petitioner, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, et al., 2015 — 135 S. Ct. 939 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Bobby CHEN, petitioner, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, et al.
135 S. Ct. 939190 L. Ed. 2d 718·Supreme Court of the United States·2015
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bobby CHEN, petitioner,
v.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, et al.
No. 13-10400.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jan. 9, 2015.
Opinion
[MAJORITY]
Petitioner has not filed a brief on the merits within 45 days of the order granting the writ of certiorari, as required by Rule 25.1. Petitioner has neither requested an extension of time nor responded to correspondence directed to the mailing address provided under Rule 34.1(f). Additional efforts to contract petitioner have been unsuccessful. Writ of certiorari accordingly dismissed.