Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington, v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp., 1964 — 375 U.S. 968 · caselaw · US
General
Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington, v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.
375 U.S. 968·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 596.
Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington, v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.
Whitman Knapp and Martin F. Richman for petitioner. William L. Lynch and James W. Lamberton for respondent. Louis-J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Sheldon Raab, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of the State of New York, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.