General
Margaret W. Duyckinck, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Appellants
125 N.Y. 710·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret W. Duyckinck, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Appellants.
(Submitted December 3, 1890;
decided January 13, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered upon an order made December 4, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. '
John F. Dillon, Ed/wa/rd C. James and Julien T. Da/oies for appellants.
A. Edward Woodruff for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on authority of Abendroth v. Manhattan R. Co. (122 N. Y. 11).
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.