General
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will, etc., of Adrian M. Suydam, Deceased. Leah V. C. Naul et al., Appellants; John D. Snedeker et al., as Executors, et al., Respondents
152 N.Y. 639·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will, etc., of Adrian M. Suydam, Deceased. Leah V. C. Naul et al., Appellants; John D. Snedeker et al., as Executors, et al., Respondents.
Matter of Suydam, 84 Hun, 514, affirmed.
(Argued March 8, 1897;
decided March 23, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Coiirt in the second judicial department, entered February 16, 1895, which affirmed a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county admitting a will to probate.
George F. Elliott and Henry M. Dater for appellants.
W. S. Cogswell, George H. Fisher and Horace Graves for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.