Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sabatino, Administrator v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs; and Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs v. Sabatino, Administrator, 1970 — 396 U.S. 1057 · caselaw · US
General
Sabatino, Administrator v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs; and Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs v. Sabatino, Administrator
396 U.S. 1057·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 753.
No. 959.
Sabatino, Administrator v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs; and Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs v. Sabatino, Administrator.
IjOuís A. Sabatino, petitioner, pro se, in No. 753, and respondent, pro se, in No. 959. Lewis Horwitz for respondent in No. 753 and for petitioner in No. 959.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 415 F. 2d 632.