Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Davis v. United States, 1966 — 384 U.S. 953 · caselaw · US
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
Davis v. United States
384 U.S. 953·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Douglas joins this dissent, adding that he would also reverse on the basis of his separate opinions in Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U. S. 463, at 482, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, at 424. · Mr. Justice Black would also grant certiorari and reverse the judgment.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 980.
Davis v. United States.
Martin Garbus for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Robert S. Erdahl and Marshall T. Golding for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[DISSENT — Mr. Justice Stewart,]
Mr. Justice Stewart,
dissenting.
The petitioner stands convicted for sending two allegedly obscene phonograph records through the mail. One of the records consists almost entirely of the sounds of percussion instruments. Its title, “Erotica,” is a gross misnomer. The second record is a transcription of passages from “Songs of Bilitis,” a book of poems published by Pierre Louys in 1894. Pierre Louys was a French poet and novelist who lived from 1870 to 1925. The Columbia Dictionary of Modern European Literature says that his poems “by their grace, by that clear imagery characteristic of the Parnassian school, and by their pure and flexible harmony of style may well become immortal; indeed few poets have ever had a more fervent worship of beauty and a more profound respect for form. The works of Louys have inspired several musicians, among whom the most notable is Claude Debussy. . . .”
Under the First Amendment this conviction cannot stand. I would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment.
Mr. Justice Douglas joins this dissent, adding that he would also reverse on the basis of his separate opinions in Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U. S. 463, at 482, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, at 424.
Mr. Justice Black would also grant certiorari and reverse the judgment.
He was also convicted for mailing nonobscene circulars advertising these records for sale. If the records are not obscene, the convictions on these advertising counts obviously cannot stand. Five additional counts involve the label of a third record, pasted on the outside of its mailing wrapper. This record was not even alleged to be obscene.
Columbia Univ. Press, N. Y., 1947.