General
Peter De Lacy, Appellant, v. Albert J. Adams, Respondent
138 N.Y. 656·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Peter De Lacy, Appellant, v. Albert J. Adams, Respondent.
(Submitted June 5, 1893;
decided June 20, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, made May 1, 1893, which reversed-an order of Special Term granting an application for an injunction pendente lite.
Howe & Hummel for appellant.
Joel M. Marx for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.