Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Crescent Creamery, Inc., et al. v. Milk Control Board et al., 1938 — 305 U.S. 559 · caselaw · US
General
Crescent Creamery, Inc., et al. v. Milk Control Board et al.
305 U.S. 559·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 238.
Crescent Creamery, Inc., et al. v. Milk Control Board et al.
Decided October 10, 1938.
Mr. U. S. Lesh for appellants.
Mr. Joseph W. Hutchinson for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed as it does not appear from the record that there is a final judgment. J. Bacon & Sons v. Martin, Commissioner of Revenue, 302 U. S. 642.