Contracts · MBE-tested
Joseph J. Little et al., Plaintiffs, v. Charles L. Webster et al., Defendants
122 N.Y. 670·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph J. Little et al., Plaintiffs, v. Charles L. Webster et al., Defendants.
(Argued October 20, 1890;
decided December 16, 1890.)
Cross-appeals from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon ;an order made May 17, 1888, which affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment reforming a contract and granting ■a recovery upon it as reformed, entered upon a decision of the -court on trial at Special Term.
James R. Marvin for plaintiffs.
Jacob F. Miller for defendants.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Yam and Haight, JJ., not sitting.
.Judgment affirmed.