General
Wirt K. WINTON, Administrator, etc., Plaintiff In Error, v. M. E. CADENHEAD, Administrator, etc., Defendant in Error
31 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Wirt K. WINTON, Administrator, etc., Plaintiff In Error, v. M. E. CADENHEAD, Administrator, etc., Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 21, 1929.
No. 8560.
D. Haden Linebaugh and Paul Pinson, both of Muskogee, Okl., for plaintiff in error.
Cad Mathis, of McAlester, OH., for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — PEE CUEIAM.]
PEE CUEIAM.
Writ of error docketed and dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, per stipulation of parties.