Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Moore et al. v. California, 1949 — 337 U.S. 915 · caselaw · US
General
Moore et al. v. California
337 U.S. 915·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 663.
Moore et al. v. California.
District Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, of California.
George E. Flood for petitioners.
Fred N. Howser, Attorney General of California, Walter Rountree and Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.