Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Kitty JACKSON et al., Appellees, 1930 — 38 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Kitty JACKSON et al., Appellees
38 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Kitty JACKSON et al., Appellees.
No. 5659.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 17, 1930.
Geo. J. Hatfield, U. S. Atty., of San Francisco, .Cal., and Albert E. Sheets, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Sacramento, Cal.
W. Ernest Dickson, of Eureka, Cal., for appellees.
Before DIETRICH and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and KERRIGAN, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Ordered mandate of Supreme Court of the United States, 50 S. Ct. 143, answering question certified, filed, and decree entered in accordance therewith, reversing decree of District Court, 27 F.(2d) 751, and directing entry of decree in District Court in accordance with prayer of complaint.