Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Blair S. LOMIRE, Appellee, 1933 — 63 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Blair S. LOMIRE, Appellee
63 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Blair S. LOMIRE, Appellee.
No. 4987.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Feb. 15, 1933.
Louis E. Graham, U. S. Atty., and W. J. Aiken, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., C. L. Dawson and Davis G. Arnold, both of Washington, D. C.
Charles M. Donley, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Challen W. Waychoff, of Waynesburg, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAYIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The sole question in this war veteran’s alleged total disability ease is whether there was evidence before the trial judge, trial by jury having been waived, from which he could reasonably find for the plaintiff. After a study of the proofs, we think there was, and accordingly affirm the judgment.