General
John Consalus et al., Respondents, v. Thomas H. Maghee et al., Appellants
50 N.Y. 679·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Consalus et al., Respondents, v. Thomas H. Maghee et al., Appellants.
(Argued November 21, 1872;
decided November 26, 1872.)
Decided upon the facts in the case; the court holding that various rulings as to rejection and reception of evidence claimed to be erroneous could not have affected the judgment.
Charles Jones for the appellants.
F. F. Bulla/rd for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.