Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Manhattan Life Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Deborah Alexander, as Administratrix of Morris Alexander, Deceased, Appellant, and Jacob P. Solomon, Defendant, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 732 · caselaw · US
Administrative
The Manhattan Life Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Deborah Alexander, as Administratrix of Morris Alexander, Deceased, Appellant, and Jacob P. Solomon, Defendant
158 N.Y. 732·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
AI concur, except Parker, Ch. J., not sitting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Manhattan Life Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Deborah Alexander, as Administratrix of Morris Alexander, Deceased, Appellant, and Jacob P. Solomon, Defendant.
(Argued March 16, 1899;
decided April 18, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of' the late General •Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 28, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Alexander, 89 Hun, 449, affirmed.
Henry A. Forster for appellant.
Artemas H. Holmes and Ed/wa/rd8. Rapadlo for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
AI concur, except Parker, Ch. J., not sitting.