Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Ed McMahan HARRISON et al., 1927 — 21 F.2d 1020 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Ed McMahan HARRISON et al.
21 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Ed McMahan HARRISON et al.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 29, 1927.
No. 7033.
Appeal from the District Court of the Upited States for the District of Utah.
S. W. Williams and Eustace Smith, of Hutchinson, Kan., for the United States.
Tyson S. Dines, Peter H. Holme, and Harold D. Roberts, all of Denver, Colo., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed per stipulation of parties.