General
Hoffman v. Chrysler Corp. et al.; and Ezzes v. Dann et al.
380 U.S. 973·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 893.
No. 954.
Hoffman v. Chrysler Corp. et al.; and Ezzes v. Dann et al.
Maximilian Bader and I. Walton Bader for petitioner in No. 893. James J. Leff for petitioner in No. 954. Francis S. Bensel, David W. Peck, Howard T. Milman, S. Samuel Arsht, Milton Pollack and Robert H. Richards, Jr., for Chrysler Corp. et al.; Norman S. Nem-ser, Stanley Nemser and William E. Taylor, Jr., for Gallo et al.; and Lewis M. Dabney, Jr., Herbert Robinson and Daniel O. Hastings for Reiver et al., respondents in both cases. Respondent Dann, pro se, in support of petitions for certiorari.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Del. Cer-tiorari denied.