Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Barbara Ellensohn, Appellant, v. John S. Keyes et al., Respondents, 1896 — 151 N.Y. 641 · caselaw · US
General
Barbara Ellensohn, Appellant, v. John S. Keyes et al., Respondents
151 N.Y. 641·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Barbara Ellensohn, Appellant, v. John S. Keyes et al., Respondents.
Ellensohn Y. Keyes, 6 App. Div. 601, appeal dismissed.
(Argued November 30, 1896;
decided December 15, 1896.)
• Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 25, 1896, which reversed an order of Special Term directing that certain issues in an action in equity be submitted to a jury.
Isaac N. Miller for appellant.
William B. Hornblower and Edward C. Perkins for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.