Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ann Amelia Sykes et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents, v. The Silver Lake Ice Company, Appellant, 1895 — 146 N.Y. 364 · caselaw · US
General
Ann Amelia Sykes et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents, v. The Silver Lake Ice Company, Appellant
146 N.Y. 364·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ann Amelia Sykes et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents, v. The Silver Lake Ice Company, Appellant.
(Argued April 9, 1895;
decided April 23, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made June 20, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Forsyth Bros, for appellant.
Walter S. Idubbell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Haight, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.