Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick A. Sands, Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Isaac Son, Survivor, etc., Appellant, 1874 — 56 N.Y. 662 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick A. Sands, Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Isaac Son, Survivor, etc., Appellant
56 N.Y. 662·New York Court of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick A. Sands, Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Isaac Son, Survivor, etc., Appellant.
(Argued April 23, 1874;
decided May 1, 1874.)
This was an action upon two promissory notes given to the Columbian Insurance Company, of which company plaintiff is receiver. One of these only was in question. The court held that the evidence clearly showed the note was given as a stock or capital note; that under the case of Jackson v. Van Slyke (52 NY Y., 645), the form of the note did not determine this question, but it was open to inquiry; and that the note was barred by the statute of limitations.
A. Bingham for the appellant.
Henry R. Mygatt for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Johnson, J.,]
Johnson, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.