Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Maria Keating, as Administratrix of the Estate of John Keating, Deceased, Appellant, v. Manhattan Railway Company, Respondent, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 614 · caselaw · US
General
Maria Keating, as Administratrix of the Estate of John Keating, Deceased, Appellant, v. Manhattan Railway Company, Respondent
186 N.Y. 614·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Maria Keating, as Administratrix of the Estate of John Keating, Deceased, Appellant, v. Manhattan Railway Company, Respondent.
Keating v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 110 App. Div. 108, appeal withdrawn.
(Submitted December 17, 1906;
decided December 21, 1906.)
Motion for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 12,1906, which reversed á judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal was improvidently taken.
Heno H. Billington for. motion.
Charles A. Gardiner opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted, without costs.