General
John Wanamaker et al., Appellants, v. Robert H. Megraw, Respondent
185 N.Y. 567·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Wanamaker et al., Appellants, v. Robert H. Megraw, Respondent.
Wanamaker v. Megraw, 102 App. Div. 614, affirmed.
(Argued May 8, 1906;
decided May 22, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 15, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered apon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover money expended on account of the defendant.
Richard Ely and Job E. Hedges for appellants.
Jacob F. Miller and Lavinia Lally for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.