Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis Straus et al., Appellants, v. Chicago Glycerine Company, Respondent, 1888 — 108 N.Y. 654 · caselaw · US
General
Louis Straus et al., Appellants, v. Chicago Glycerine Company, Respondent
108 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Straus et al., Appellants, v. Chicago Glycerine Company, Respondent.
(Argued January 31, 1888;
decided February 28, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme ■Court in the first judicial department, made the first Monday •of May, 1887, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion on the part of defendant to vacate and set aside a levy under a warrant of attachment herein and which vacated said leVy.
William T. Morris for appellants.
James Byrne for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Danfobth, J., not voting.
Order affirmed.