General
Nivens v. Hudspeth, Warden
317 U.S. 628·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 188.
Nivens v. Hudspeth, Warden.
October 12, 1942.
Claud Nivens, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Mr. Oscar A. Provost for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.