Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, v. Modern Trashmoval, Inc., 1964 — 377 U.S. 925 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, v. Modern Trashmoval, Inc.
377 U.S. 925·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 947.
Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, v. Modern Trashmoval, Inc.
Solicitor General Cox, Charles Donahue, Bessie Margolin and Jack H. Weiner for petitioner.
Charles G. Page for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.