General
Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Salt Lake Western Railroad Co. et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al.; and Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Thompson, Trustee, et al.
329 U.S. 679·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 278,
No. 279,
No. 280,
No. 281,
No. 282,
October Term, 1945.
October Term, 1945.
October Term, 1945.
October Term, 1945.
October Term, 1945.
Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Salt Lake Western Railroad Co. et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., Trustee, et al.; Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al.; and Reconstruction Finance Corp. et al. v. Thompson, Trustee, et al.
October 28, 1946.
[MAJORITY]
The Chief Justice announced that Mr. Justice Frankfurter has filed an opinion setting forth the detailed grounds for his dissent from the opinion and judgment of the Court entered June 10, 1946, in these cases.
Dissenting opinion reported in 328 U. S. at 536.