Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Northern Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Michael Golden, 1991 — 220 U.S. 625 · caselaw · US
General
Northern Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Michael Golden
220 U.S. 625·Supreme Court of the United States·1991
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 461.
Northern Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Michael Golden.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Montana.
March 20, 1911.
Mr. Charles W. Bunn and Mr. W. Wallace, Jr., for the plaintiff in error.
No appearance for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Evans Browne for the plaintiff in error.