Contracts · MBE-tested

BANKS v. CALIFORNIA

382 U.S. 420·Supreme Court of the United States·1966

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration of this motion and petition.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

BANKS v. CALIFORNIA. No. 87, Misc. Decided January 24, 1966. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Charles W. Rumph, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, for further proceedings in light of Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration of this motion and petition.