Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re Disbarment of Ehrlichman, 1975 — 421 U.S. 905 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
In re Disbarment of Ehrlichman
421 U.S. 905·United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania·1975
Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. D-48.
In re Disbarment of Ehrlichman.
See also note, supra, p. 901.
[MAJORITY]
It is ordered that John Daniel Ehrlichman, of Bellevue, Wash., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be dis-
barred from the practice of law in this Court.
Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.