General
David Lamar, Plaintiff in Error, v. Albert G. Spalding
203 U.S. 584·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 110.
David Lamar, Plaintiff in Error, v. Albert G. Spalding.
Argued for defendant in error and submitted for plaintiff in error November 16, 1906.
Decided November 19, 1906.
Mr. Alan H. Strong and Mr. Harry Allen Mendelson for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edmund .Wilson for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey.
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230. Case below, 68 N. J. Eq. 686.