Bankruptcy
In the Matter of Charles L. WOODY, Jr., Harold Russell Ryder and Lucien A. Hold, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Woody & Co., Alleged Bankrupts, Charles L. Woody, Jr., Objector-Appellant, Carl E. Ward, Claimant-Appellee
57 F.2d 1087·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Charles L. WOODY, Jr., Harold Russell Ryder and Lucien A. Hold, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Woody & Co., Alleged Bankrupts, Charles L. Woody, Jr., Objector-Appellant, Carl E. Ward, Claimant-Appellee.
No. 368.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 2, 1932.
White & Case, of New York City (Graham D. Mattison and William St. John To-zer, both of New York City, of counsel), for objector-appellant, Charles L. Woody, Jr.
Graves & Yawger, of New York City (Charles S. Yawger, of New York City, of counsel), for claimant-appellee, Carl B. Ward.
Garey & Garey, of New York City (Eugene L. Garey, Earl J. Garey, and Edward K. Kennedy, all of New York City, of counsel), amici curias.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM!.]
PER CURIAM!.
Order [57 F.(2d) 207] affirmed.