Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES, et al., appellants, v. GOLDEN BETHUNE-HILL, et al., 2018 — 139 S. Ct. 481 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES, et al., appellants, v. GOLDEN BETHUNE-HILL, et al.
139 S. Ct. 481202 L. Ed. 2d 374·Supreme Court of the United States·2018
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES, et al., appellants,
v.
GOLDEN BETHUNE-HILL, et al.
No. 18-281.
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 13, 2018.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits. In addition to the questions presented by the jurisdictional statement, the parties are directed to fully brief the following question: Whether appellants have standing to bring this appeal.