Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of HOYLE & RARICK CLOTHING COMPANY, Bankrupt, Appellant, 1933 — 65 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In the Matter of HOYLE & RARICK CLOTHING COMPANY, Bankrupt, Appellant
65 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of HOYLE & RARICK CLOTHING COMPANY, Bankrupt, Appellant.
No. 397.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 8, 1933.
Joseph Giller and Archibald Palmer, both of New York City (Sydney Basil Levy and Herbert H. Klein, both of New York City, on the brief), for'appellant.
Gregory, Stewart & Montgomery, of New York City (W. Randolph Montgomery, of New York City, of counsel) for Hub Furniture Co.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed.