Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Co. et al.; and Co-Operative Legislative Committee, Railroad Brotherhoods in the State of Pennsylvania v. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Co. et al., 1968 — 393 U.S. 959 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Co. et al.; and Co-Operative Legislative Committee, Railroad Brotherhoods in the State of Pennsylvania v. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Co. et al.
393 U.S. 959·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 443.
No. 638.
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Co. et al.; and Co-Operative Legislative Committee, Railroad Brotherhoods in the State of Pennsylvania v. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Co. et al.
William A. Goichman, Edward Munce, and Joseph C. Bruno for petitioner in No. 443, and G. P. MacDougall for petitioner in No. 638.
R. N. Clattenburg, Donald A. Brinkworth, and Gordon E. Neuenschwander for respondents in both cases.
Sheldon E. Bernstein for Railway Labor Executives' Assn., as amicus curiae, in support of the petitions in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.