General
Helen Josephine Hagarty, Respondent, v. John Moyka and Anton Wiener, Appellants
168 A.D. 924·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1915·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Helen Josephine Hagarty, Respondent, v. John Moyka and Anton Wiener, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Without expressing an opinion as to whether the complaint states a cause of action, we are of opinion that the answer puts in issue the allegations of the complaint, and it cannot be regarded as frivolous. The order is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.